US: New study puts forward case for hiking up alcohol taxes

42721a84-3af9-4bfc-92a4-3446c3e257c8articleimage.jpg

13 Dec 2017 --- US state alcohol excise taxes are typically only a few cents per drink and have not kept pace with inflation, according to a new study. Soon to be published in the January issue of the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, authors claim that hiking up taxes would be a chance for US states to increase revenues while simultaneously improving public health costs related to excessive alcohol consumption.

Although excise taxes are the most common type of tax levied in alcohol sales, used by all 50 states for beer and by most states for wine and spirits, they are not well understood, says the study. 

The formula is based on a fixed cost per unit volume (for example, US$18 for a barrel of beer, regardless of the brand or cost of the beer). Because the tax is not easy to understand, in the current study researchers calculated tax amounts in relation to standard drink sizes in the US. 

They found that, across states, the average excise tax is three cents for a 12-ounce beer, three cents for a five-ounce glass of wine, and five cents for a typical shot of liquor.

Also, because flat taxes are based on volume sold, not on a percentage of the sale price, they don't keep pace with inflation. 

Added to that, most states haven't changed the amount of their excise taxes in quite some time. As a result, in inflation-adjusted dollars, the researchers calculated that the average state alcohol excise tax has declined by 30 percent for beer, 27 percent for wine, and 32 percent for spirits since 1991.

“The most important finding here is that alcohol excise taxes are incredibly low,” says the study's lead author Timothy S. Naimi, M.D., M.P.H., from Boston Medical Center and BU School of Medicine. “In several states, the price is so low that it rounds to zero pennies. Basically no excise tax at all.”

Two factors likely contributed to this decline, says Naimi. First, excise taxes don't receive a lot of attention. They happen behind the scenes and are already built into the cost of a case of beer or a glass of wine at a bar – the consumer doesn't see them. 

Secondly, there is political pressure not to raise any kind of taxes on alcohol sales.

For reducing problems caused by alcohol consumption, “no policy has a better track record of effectiveness than do alcohol taxes,” Naimi said. “There's very strong evidence that raising prices through taxes or other means – making it a little less cheap – has lots of possible benefits.”

“For people who are drinking a lot, it has a surprisingly big impact on consumption and related harms. Raising taxes could help solve state budget problems and is a great way to raise revenue. A lot of people would cast it as a win-win.”

Research cited in the study shows that 88,000 deaths and US$249 billion in costs each year are caused by excessive alcohol consumption in the US. 

Naimi said research has shown that when the cost of a drink increases by 10 percent, people tend to drink 5 to 6 percent less. This decrease could help bring about reductions in health care costs, alcohol-related car accidents and other harms.

Although excise taxes could be written to be indexed to inflation, no state has done that, according to Naimi.

“Unless taxes are adjusted, they're constantly eroding due to inflation,” he said. “Price has a dampening effect on consumption, and higher taxes definitely put the brakes on how much people drink. It's a pretty efficient way to cut consumption and related harms.”

An accompanying editorial written by Jeremy Bray, Ph.D., of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, and Thomas Babor, Ph.D., M.P.H., of UConn Health in Farmington, Connecticut, says that Naimi and his colleagues make a compelling case for increasing excise alcohol taxes as a way to increase state revenues, decrease the consequences of excessive consumption and reduce the need for health care services. Bray and Babor refer to this potential as an alcohol policy “trifecta.”

“Most states have not only an opportunity to raise revenues and improve public health at the same time but also a moral obligation to prevent the further erosion of the protections that tax policies provide to excessive drinkers,” they write. “From our perspective, this type of descriptive research has enormous implications for policy that should not be ignored.”

To contact our editorial team please email us at editorial@cnsmedia.com

Related Articles

Food Ingredients News

US-EU soybean trade skyrockets but industry concerns over low prices and China trade conflict remain

21 Sep 2018 --- Earlier this year when the trade conflict between the US and China first began to bite, the US soybean industry was bracing itself for severe losses as China slapped tariffs on the legumes as part of a retaliation package. While the industry continues to advocate for an end to the tariff war and for long-term solutions to the loss of export markets, new figures reveal that the US has overtaken Brazil as the leading soybean supplier to the European Union with a 52 percent market share.

Food Ingredients News

Layn rolls out new sweetener platforms in Mexico

21 Sep 2018 --- Layn Corp. is rolling out its advanced sweetener and flavor systems in Mexico at the FoodTech Summit & Expo taking place in Mexico City September 26-27. The company is introducing its Lovia sweetener platform and showcasing Monk Fruit by Layn.

Food Ingredients News

Stevia leaf marketing intensifies amid North and Latin American NPD boom

21 Sep 2018 --- Stevia application continues to grow in food and beverages when assessing CAGR between 2013 and 2017. According to new Innova Market Insights data presented in a webinar yesterday, the rise in applications in North America at 17 percent, Australasia on 21 percent and especially Latin America on 37 percent has been spectacular. As consumer awareness around the sweetener grows, new product data points to a rise in marketing in American markets where “sweetened with stevia” is mentioned more frequently on the front of packaged goods.

Food Ingredients News

Weekly Roundup: Nestlé sells Gerber Life Insurance, Givaudan completes Naturex acquisition

21 Sep 2018 --- In business news this week, Nestlé announced plans to sell Gerber Life Insurance Company, to Western & Southern Financial Group for US$1.55 billion in cash. Bösch Boden Spies launched a sustainability initiative and Givaudan completed the acquisition of Naturex, following the implementation of the squeeze-out procedure and the delisting of Naturex shares from the Euronext Paris stock exchange. Firmenich appointed Emmanuel Butstraen as president of its Flavors Business Unit and member of the company’s executive committee and Tyson Foods’ CEO Tom Hayes is stepping down.

Food Ingredients News

Canada: Trans fat ban comes into force, transition period begins

20 Sep 2018 --- This week marks the beginning of a ban on Canada’s partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), the largest source of industrially produced trans fat in foods. It is now illegal for manufacturers to add PHOs to foods sold in Canada. This includes Canadian and imported foods, as well as those prepared in all food service establishments. One of the key reasons behind the ban is to help reduce the risk of heart disease in the country and the ban comes from an earlier mandate to eliminate trans fat in a bid to cut heart disease.

More Articles